THE TRIAL OF LT.COLONEL TERRENCE LAKIN

From: Robert Quinn
Date: 1-10-2013
To: americanresistanceparty@mail.com
Subject: Fw: THE TRIAL OF LT.COLONEL TERRENCE LAKIN

May 8,2010
Fox NewsNew York City,New York
Att:Bill O'Reilly and Megyn Kelly:

Dear Bill and Megyn:

THE TRIAL OF LT.COLONEL TERRENCE LAKIN

I have termed this article a "trial" because I, and many others felt that when you aired this segment a short while ago your viewers were going to receive a dialogue on LTC Lakin's upcoming court-martial. Instead, we saw and heard a two-headed monologue denigrating every aspect of LTC Lakin's defense of conduct. I would like to respond to the most serious of your comments (recorded), trusting my words may induce you to rectify your unfair and unbalanced presentation.

Bill:"You can't have military saying 'I'll obey the orders I like'".

Response: LTC Lakin never said or implied such a thing. He obeyed all orders for 18 years, not just one's he 'liked'. Only when he began to realize that Obama may not have been eligible to seek the Presidency did he ask, in good conscience, for confirmation of Obama's authority. After waiting one year unsuccessfully for a responsible clarification he, on his own, stood up for Our Constitution. For that, you would knock him down!

Bill:"Why doesn't LTC Lakin just resign?

Response: Resigning would have been the safest way out but one doesn't receive a Bronze Star for "playing it safe". Also, by risking his career through a court-martial he may have considered this as the most viable manner of forcing Obama to satisfy this issue for everyone by producing the original Hawaiian Dept. of Health Birth Certificate, not the document he put on a website to pacify those questioning his eligibility.

Bill:"I think Lakin was trying to make a political point."

Response: LTC Lakin has given 18 years of service to the Army. Were his medals and promotions "political points"? NO. They were for defending Our Constitution and our Country. You dishonored the man with your comment.

Bill:"The 'birther' movement hasn't gathered any traction."

Response: Bill, the "Constitutional Defenders", who you so casually link together as "birthers", consists of thousands of participants(seen at rallies throughout the U.S.) protesting against Constitutional violations of all kinds. Traction? Their feet are solidly on the ground and they are moving forward relentlessly. Millions are witnessing this. I hope that you are not using the Major Media for information on this issue.

Megyn:"Lakin didn't go with any of the other lawyers who represented other "birthers".

Response: You may think that LTC Lakin would have been best served by a lawyer previously involved in a similar lawsuit but your future is not the one at stake. Also, you referred to LTC Lakin as a "birther". He is a "Constitutional Defender", challenging Obama's eligibility whether through his birth certificate, passport, school records, etc. Does that also make him a "Passporter"?

Megyn:"Some said Bush was illegitimate-their argument wasn't allowed".

Response: Presuming you were speaking about Florida's voting issue your comparison is not legitimate. Bush's eligibility to seek the Presidency was never an issue in question....Obama's eligibility was and is.

Bill (to Megyn):"Do you know how we proved Obama was born in USA? We got birth announcements in two papers-that's impossible (to falsify ?) because someone would have to know that they were going to fake Obama's birth because someday he's going to be President."

Response: That is a false statement. You did not prove Obama was born in the USA. You never saw his original Hawaiian birth certificate , which he refused to release to anyone. It seems two newspaper birth announcements became "Gospel" to you, when, in fact, birth announcements are simply public announcements that a baby was born. They do not provide any information about the child's citizenship, cannot be authenticated and hold no weight of evidence to support either side of the eligibility argument. Also, your sarcasm (implying Constitutional Defenders believe Obama's family faked a birth certificate in anticipation of his someday becoming President) is not worthy of you. Securing an American "naturalized" citizenship status for one's child would be highly prized for it bestows many benefits on the child with one major exception....only a "natural-born" status allows one to seek the Presidency of the U.S. (Constitution-article 2, Sec.1) Why have you not questioned why Obama, a Constitutional scholar, would pay over $2 million dollars in legal fees to prevent anyone from viewing the Hawaiian original birth certificate and deliberately post a "Certification of Live Birth(which is what you saw) on a website, passing it off as a supposed valid document establishing his Presidential eligibility?. Please do not insult me by saying that he did all this to distract Republicans from other issues.

Bill:"The papers only print birth announcements when the baby is born. You call them & tell them 'hey, the baby was born'. (Continuing) "He was born in the USA-you can't fake that."'

Response: Obviously, you are pinning your entire defense of Obama's eligibility on the newspapers.If my responses above cannot cause you to re-think your words I can only suggest prayer.

Megyn:"Maybe there were two Barack Obamas"

Response: Illogical sarcasm about such a grave issue does not become you, Megyn, and cheapens the dialogue.

Megyn:"Hawaiian Health officials said 'we've seen it''' (referring to the birth certificate)

Response: They acknowledged seeing a birth certificate but did not define it as a true "Certificate of Live Birth", showing the Hospital, Doctor, and witnesses names, certificate number, etc. Transparency by Obama could have well put this issue to rest yet he refuses to allow anyone (including Fox) to view the hospital copy. Clearly, the meaning of the word "transparency" is not seen by him.

THE SILENT SIDE OF YOUR 'DEBATE'

Obama never offered to produce a "Certificate of Live Birth", which could have saved many lawsuits. In particular, he ignored the pending military action (since withdrawn) against Major Stefan Cook and the now-pending Court-Martial being prepared against LTC Lakin. Imagine, a Commander-in-Chief of our military refusing to assure them and others by providing a document which no one else in our Military has ever refused to provide.

Why didn't either of you mention Obama's refusal to release school records,etc. or which country issued a passport to him to go to Pakistan in 1981 or the active cases presently being heard in various courts on the eligibility issues?

Republicans know that any request by them ,of Obama, to satisfy LTC Lakin's request would be futile, but where was the voice of any Democrat?

Bill, you did not present a "fair and balanced" analysis. Both of you spent all your time criticizing or ridiculing LTC Lakin. Many people contacted me to voice their displeasure with your unfair treatment. Why not have him come on your show like you have done with so many others through the years?

Obama once said that the "Certification of Live Birth" which he posted on a website was a copy of the one which the Hawaiian Health Dept had. If true, that statement would mean he was never eligibile to seek the Presidency....and that he knew it. If, on the other hand, the Hawaiian copy was a true Certificate of Live Birth it could prove Obama eligible, leaving one unanswered question. Why did he spend over $2 million dollars to keep this a secret!

CONCLUSION

LTC Lakin is going to be court-martialed and Obama, who holds a "keep out of jail free" card refuses to produce it. Secrecy over Support. How inspiring this must be to our men and women in Service!

Very truly yours,

bsp; R. Quinn
New York
CC: Every member of The Supreme Court.
Everyone else I know

ALL RECIPIENTS OF THIS LETTER ARE FREE TO PASS IT ON TO ANY AND ALL WITHOUT SECURING MY PERMISSION.

---

Even in a 'bad' year, you don't need the flu shot

By Dr. Mark Stengler
HouseCalls@newmarkethealth.com

So it's officially a "bad" flu season -- one where more people are supposedly getting sick and more people will continue to get sick, at least according to the latest warning from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Sound familiar? Of course it does. The CDC hits the panic button every year -- but it's never about spreading information.

It's about marketing.

Specifically, they're marketing flu shots -- because every single doom-and-gloom prediction from the CDC ends in a sales pitch: Get your flu shots, or else. But whether it's a "bad" year for flu or a good one, the dirty secret about the shot is that it doesn't actually help prevent it nearly as effectively as those ads appear to promise.

Forget the marketing and just look at the numbers. Between 1989 and 1997, the flu shot vaccination rate more than doubled among seniors, from 32 percent to 67 percent.

If the shot really worked, we should see fewer sick seniors during flu season -- and certainly fewer seniors fighting for their lives with the illness in hospitals, right?

Well, it turns out that hasn't happened. In fact, overall, the flu hospitalization rate among seniors actually rose between 1979 and 2001, according to one study.

Now, it's one thing to be merely ineffective. That's bad enough, especially for a shot being marketed aggressively with your tax dollars.

What makes the shot so much worse is that it may actually cause the very flu it's supposed to prevent. People who followed CDC orders and got the 2008-2009 seasonal flu shot, for example, actually had a higher risk of swine flu the following year.

And even if the shot doesn't cause the flu, the side effects can be just as bad -- including aches, low-grade fever, and more.

If that's what passes for flu "protection," you can count me out -- and that hasn't put me at risk. In fact, I never get the flu shot, I'm exposed to sick patients daily and yet I haven't had so much as a sniffle in years.

I'm not lucky. I just have a turbo-charged immune system -- and you can do the same thing for yourself with basic nutrients you can find in any vitamin shop or even most supermarkets.

Readers of my printed newsletter, Health Revelations, got the full scoop on natural flu prevention in my December 2012 issue. If you're not a subscriber yourself, it's not too late -- sign up today, and you'll get full access in my online archives.

One more note about flu shots: Most of them still contain thimerosal, a preservative that's made from mercury. It's a toxic heavy metal that has no business being inside the human body -- yet health officials want to keep pumping it into children.

---

My Radio Show Report of an "EVIL" California Federal Court Judge

January 7, 2013

Today I was on the TERRY LAKIN ACTION FUND RADIO SHOW. It was hosted by Marco Ciavolino. Marco sent out a promotional email which stated:

Monday, January 7, 2013: Eligibility:
It's Not Over Yet. The Three Ring Circus of the California Court

"This is a must listen show as we interview Ed Noonan and his story of the amazingly, astoundingly absurd court hearing he was given at recent trial in California. It is more evidence that the issue of Constitutional eligibility is a concern to the courts and their ongoing mockery of the issue is beyond comprehension."

And they continued, "Ed says, "In the hearing on the 3rd, the Federal Attorney said I did not have standing since I was not the GENERAL ELECTION candidate and only ran against Soetoro (aka BHO) in the Primary. The cesspool-bottom-feeder Judge England agreed with him and he said that since none of us were OBAMA VOTERS we came in SECOND and people who come in SECOND in an election have no right to challenge the winner of an election. I don't understand England's little tap-dance about this confusing new FEDERAL MANDATE but I guess people smarter than I can help me grasp this strange new-world concept.""

ONLY ONE WORD CAN DESCRIBE THE JAN 3TH TRO HEARING..."EVIL!"

MY RADIO SHOW ACCUSATION OF THE "EVIL" OF THE TRO HEARING JUDGE...

I must confess that this was the first radio interview I have had since I was interviewed by Fox News before the California Primary as a Presidential candidate in the American Independent Party. (Third Party candidates are ALWAYS ignored during the campaign cycle.) I have heard nothing from the news media before nor after the CA Presidential primary.

In this radio interview I attempted to explain what we were trying to do with the January 3th TRO (Temporary Restraining Order) hearing. I explained that we attempting to prevent the California Secretary of State (Debra Bowen) and the California Governor (Jerry Brown) from illegally certifying the Certificate of Ascertainment of an illegal alien. And this was because of the lack of proof of eligibility for a certain foreign Indonesian citizen named Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Obama Soebarkah, (or whatever his name is). Mr. Soetoro has consistantly failed to prove that he is qualified to run for the U.S. Presidency nor prove he is eligible to hold the position of Commander-in-Chief. We asserted in the TRO that Soetoro was using a forged "short form" Hawaiian birth certificate, was using a forged "long form" birth certificate, was using a forged Selective Service certificate and was using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number (042-68-4425) as a proof of his citizenship. This shows no legitimacy and nor fitness for office.

The TRO also asked that the Electoral College, President of the Senate, and the entire U.S. Congress be forbidden to declare this illegal alien named Barry Soetoro to be certified as a qualified candidate in the State of California.

I charged on the radio show that Judge England failed to act in a professional and impartial manner. Instead, Chief Judge England acted as if he was Soetoro’s personal attorney and partisan defender.

I reported that Judge England can be quoted as saying that candidates who came in “SECOND” and lost to a winning candidate can have no place in his court. He agreed with the US Attorney who said that any Third Party candidate who won in the primary but only appeared on only ONE STATE BALLOT (me) (in California) could be discriminated against because such insignificant minorities do not count nor “have standing” and cannot complain even if they are forced to run against an illegal alien for the top office of the United States of Amerika.

In addition, the US Attorney claimed that there was no requirement for the US President to have a valid birth certificate and a valid selective service certificate and a valid Social Security number, that the US Constitution does not state that a president is supposed to have valid papers.

The judge nodded and told us Plaintiffs that indeed the US Constitution does not require the US President to have valid IDs.

My attorney, Orly Taitz responded to them saying that the US Constitution does not require the President to have a pulse either. There is nothing in the US Constitution saying that the U.S. President is supposed to have any brain activity, however it is common sense to believe or at least hope that the U.S. President would have a pulse and correspnding brain activity.

My attorney, Orly Taitz is quoted in the Sacramento Bee showing her response to the ridicule from the judge. She said, “Similarly the U.S. Constitution does not say that the birth certificate of the President should not be forged, however it is common sense to believe that if the President has to be a natural born citizen, he should have a valid birth certificate and not a computer generated forgery, that he would not be using a stolen Social Security number and a forged selective service certificate.”

You can read her entire statement to the Sacramento Bee at: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/01/03/5091099/orly-taitzs-obama-birther-claims.html#storylink=cpy

My conclusion of this whole case is that this so called “chief federal judge just threw out the law and made his decision based on his beliefs and agenda. Which is WRONG!

The petition for an Emergency Temporary Restraining Order was denied without a second thought from this corrupt federal judge. This hearing is now mingled with the other 300-500 ballot challenges that have been denied during the last four years. Not a single case has ever been heard, nor given subpoena power. No discovery has ever been allowed. Instead the cesspool-judges attempt to keep their judgeships so as to keep bringing in their monthly ill-gotten federal cash into their personal bank accounts. If a case ever is brought up as a fair hearing the United States would end. It would be a constitutional crises. No one would get their monthly government-dole-paychecks and the judges would be cutting their own throats…. So they all willingly allow the country to suffer and let a Muslim Marxist squat in the White House. Lucifer is proud of his judges in their fine black robes! Babylon is here and evil stalks our courts.

Edward C. Noonan
Founder & National Committee Chairman:
American Resistance Party
http://www.americanresistanceparty.org

My Urgent Appeal to State Assemblyman Logue

The Honorable Dan Logue
California State Assembly
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0001
December 12, 2012

Dear Mr. Logue:

I am writing to voice my urgent appeal to you to submit an Assembly Bill to prevent the unconstitutional forcing of Californians (aka Yuba County citizens) to purchase ObamaCare health insurance.

First of all, Mr. Soetoro (aka BHO) has failed to prove that he is a U.S. Citizen. He submitted two forged Birth Certificates to the citizens of the United States. He first did so in 2008 and then again April 27, 2011. The April document has been investigated by Sheriff Arpaio in Arizona and the Birth Certificate has been reported to be bogus. Hence, Mr. Soetoro cannot prove that he is a citizen of the U.S.

Mr. Soetoro has also provided a bogus/forged Selective Service registration card and he has formerly used multiple Social Security numbers. And he has never proved that he rebuked his Indonesian citizenship and regained his U.S. Citizenship. Instead, it is suspected that he went to college as a foreign student from the nation of Indonesia. Is he a U.S. Citizen? No he is NOT!

Presently I am a Plaintiff in a Sacramento Superior Court case (the case was unfairly denied a hearing) challenging Mr. Soetoro's placement on the 2012 ballot. I am also currently a plaintiff in a California appeal proceeding, which is now a U.S. Supreme Court filing on this same matter. All courts have denied my petition and have been dismissed without a fair hearing. Over 500 court cases (from fellow Amerikans) have been filed throughout Amerika and not a single judge has allowed discovery on the matter, nor have been given a fair hearing.

With this in mind, we need to challenge the ObamaCare thuggery. I urge you to submit this bill (shown below) immediately and help protect all of us voters in your district.

Respectfully,

(s) Edward C. Noonan
2012 Founder – American Resistance Party
2012 National Chairman – American Resistance Party
2002 Winner – CA AIP Primary – Secretary of State
2006 Winner – CA AIP Primary – Governor
2010 Winner – CA AIP Primary – U.S. Senate
2012 Winner – CA AIP Primary – President 2012
2006-2008 State Party Chairman – American Independent Party

Yuba County Voter
937 N. Beale Rd Suite D
PMB 119
Marysville, CA 95901
(530) 777-3474

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

PROPOSED CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY LEGISLATION:

California Health Freedom Act.

(a) This section shall be known and may be cited as the "California Health Freedom Act."

(b) As used in this section:

(1) "Healthcare services" means any service, treatment, or provision of product for the care of physical or mental disease, illness, injury, defect or condition, or to otherwise maintain or improve physical or mental health, subject to all laws and rules regulating health service providers and products within this state;

(2) "Mode of securing" means to purchase directly or on credit or by trade, or to contract for third-party payment by insurance or other legal means authorized by the state, or to apply for or accept employer or government-sponsored healthcare benefits under such conditions as may legally be required as a condition of such benefits, or any combination of the same;

(3) "Penalty" means any civil or criminal fine, tax, salary or wage withholding, surcharge, fee or any other imposed consequence established by law or rule of a government or its subdivision or agency that is used to punish or discourage the exercise of rights protected under this chapter.

(c) (1) The power to require or regulate a person's choice in the mode of securing healthcare services, or to impose a penalty related thereto, is not found in the Constitution of the United States, and is therefore a power reserved to the people pursuant to the ninth amendment, and to the several states pursuant to the tenth amendment. This state hereby exercises its sovereign power to declare the public policy of this state regarding the right of all persons residing in this state in choosing the mode of securing healthcare services.

(2) It is declared that the public policy of this state, consistent with our constitutionally-recognized and inalienable right of liberty, is that every person within this state is and shall be free to choose or to decline to choose any mode of securing healthcare services without penalty or threat of penalty; provided, however, that this title and and any other such titles concerning requirements for healthcare coverage of children in child support cases shall not be altered in any manner by this section.

(3) It is declared that the public policy of this state, consistent with our constitutionally-recognized and inalienable right of liberty, is that every person within this state has the right to purchase health insurance or to refuse to purchase health insurance, unless purchase of health insurance is otherwise a condition of employment. The government may not interfere with a citizen's right to purchase health insurance or with a citizen's right to refuse to purchase health insurance. The government may not enact a law that would restrict these rights or that would impose a form of punishment for exercising either of these rights. Any law to the contrary shall be void ab initio.

(4) The policy stated in this section shall not be applied to impair any right of contract related to the provision of healthcare services to any person or group.
(d) No public official, employee, or agent of this state or any of its political subdivisions shall act to impose, collect, enforce, or effectuate any penalty in this state that violates the public policy set forth in this section.

[end]
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

8 "Ineligibles" Who Have Tried Their Paws & Hooves At Politics

--- On Tue, 12/11/12, P. B. wrote:

From: P. B.
Subject: Re: Did Obama steal the 2012 election? WND
To: JasmineSea
Cc: "Jerome Corsi" "POLITCAL George Miller" "Chris Strunk"
Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2012, 12:58 AM

thanks.. i haven't finished reading it yet.. tired.. will try again tomorrow.

i think the biggest thing to look at is the total numbers voting for romney being 3 million less than McShame.

that is absolute BS..the problem is that the machines did not count all romney votes.. all of these machines need to be analyzed in the swing states. They were programmed to not count any ballots with romney votes, or every other third or so for example, this way the vote totals would still sink with the machine receipt totals.. this means a ballot that had Romneys name was not counted at all.. this not only would help obama but the Dem Senators and Dem Reps.

the machines can be programmed when exactly when to start and stop the vote fraud according to programming experts familiar with the technology. this explains the illogical "winning" by Dems in this horrible economy.

Jerry or Bob, do you have connections where you can have programmers look at the machine that was confiscated in Maryland.. of the ones in FL?

P. B.

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

MY REPLY

Of course the elections are crooked. They have been for many years. I ran for office for the first time in 2002 (CA Secretary of State) and I got less than 1.5% of the vote. In 2006 I ran for Governor (CA) and got less than 1.5%. In 2010 I ran for U.S. Senate and got less than 1.5%. In 2012 I ran for POTUS and got less than 1.5%. Now please remember that I won the Primary in all four elections and in BOTH the primary and General elections I consistantly got 1.5% or less.

However, during the same time the Secretary of State ran elections at various high schools and of course the tallies were much different. I got a range between 10%-22%.

What I am saying is that it is statistically impossible to remain at 1.2%-1.5% ALL NIGHT, through 7 different elections. IT CANNOT BE HONESTLY DONE! There is not a ounce of honesty in any election anywhere in Amerika.

The jackass Election clerks prove that they cannot be trusted! The following stories of ANIMALS winning elections prove the point that Election Clerks do not obey the law and check the eligibilty of candidates. In 2008 (see below) a cute wiener dog named Molly ran against Soetoro for President. Neither candidate (animal or human) seemed to be of concern with that State's Chief Elections clerk, nor the County jackass that ran the county fake elections.

(Note: The closest animal being elected California office is in Sunol, CA just south of Sacramento. Read below of the Rottweiler-mix-dog-Mayor named Bosco Ramos.)

Gimme a break! Honest Election? Bull! There is no such thing!

Edward C. Noonan
National Chairman - American Resistance Party

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

8 Animals Who Have Tried Their Paws & Hooves At Politics

Jill Harness • Wednesday, September 12, 2012 at 5:00 AM
http://www.neatorama.com/2012/09/12/8-Animals-Who-Have-Tried-Their-Paws-Hooves-At-Politics/

Election time is coming soon and it won't be long soon before the candidates really start showing their teeth as they try to rip one another to shreds. Of course, if you think most politicians act like animals, well wait until you hear about these eight literal political animals.

Stubbs

One of the most famous animals with a political office is Stubbs the Cat, who has served as mayor of Talkeetna, Alaska for the past 15 years. When he was just a kitten, Stubbs won by write-in vote beating out a number human candidates whom the majority of the town's 900 residents found to be undesirable mayoral-candidates.

The mayor might not have much power as Talkeetna is a historical district, but he has brought in a lot of tourist and his constituents seem to be happy with him, "He doesn't raise our taxes -- we have no sales tax. He doesn't interfere with business. He's honest," said Lauri Stec, manager of Nagley's General Store, which doubles as the mayor's office.

Junior Cochran

A black lab named Junior Cochran was elected mayor in Rabbit Hash, Kentucky back in 2004. He received over 3,000 votes. Interestingly, there was a dog elected mayor of the town once before that, although I can't find any information on the previous mayor. Junior was quite popular in the town and even starred in an Animal Planet documentary called “Mayor Dog.”

Unfortunately, he died only four years into his term at the tender old age of 12. "He was a great mayor. The kids all liked him the best and they would do Old Timers Day, Labor Day weekend was the biggest day he could come down and kids just loved it," said Rabbit Hash resident Suzanne Hobbs in memory of her town's great leader.

Sources: Rabbit Hash, Fox 19, Geekosystem

Lucy Lou

Rabbit Hash wasn't about to just give up on Junior's legacy that easily. Shortly after his death an election was held to find a new mayor. The race was ruthless, including 10 dogs, a cat, an opossum, a mule –and one outmatched human who conceded early on election day. In the end though, the office went to the dogs –or at least, one specific dog, Lucy Lou, a red-and-white border collie who garnered over 8,000 votes. Lucy Lou is still in office six years later and she's maintained her policies on feline and canine accessability in the General Store. She is also very active in local fundraising events.

Sources: Mother Nature Network, Geekosystem, Rabbit Hash

Clay Henry

Rabbit Hash and Talkeetna are far from the only towns who have elected critters for mayors and it's not only house pets who have filled political offices. Lajitas, Texas had a beer-swilling goat named Clay Henry III serving as mayor from 1986 through 2011.

If you're wondering how he served that long, that's because there were actually three goats named Clay Henry to serve as mayor of Lajitas –the first one was elected all the way back in 1986. The first Clay Henry died in 1992 and his son took over until he died in 2000. Unfortunately, the legacy ended with Clay Henry III, as he was castrated by an angry local man in 2006, who was jealous that the goat was allowed to drink on Sunday when the rest of the town went dry for the Lord's Day. Clay Henry III died in 2011, but you can still come by and see the taxidermied ex-mayor, posed with a beer bottle in his mouth, at the Terlingua Trading Post. Of course, the town had a good reason for electing the goats as mayor –the beer-drinking mayors have greatly increased tourism to the small town, even in a taxidermied state.

Sources: Mother Nature Network, Roadside America

Bosco Ramos

The problem with having an animal serve as your mayors is that most critters just don't live that long –and no one seems to have the foresight to elect a parrot or giant tortoise. Sunol, California had a black lab/Rottweiler mix named Bosco serve as mayor for an impressive ten years, but he died in 1990 and since then, the city has returned to human leadership.

If you're curious how these towns can get away with having an animal in power, well, the reality is that most of the towns are unincorporated, so the mayorship is mostly a ceremonial position that most critters can handle just fine.

Source

Hank

Animals haven't just been known to serve as mayor though. Some critters have much bigger political aspirations. Take, for example, Hank, the 9 year-old cat who is running for an open Senate seat in Virginia. While Hank hasn't used any mudslinging in his ads, Canines for a Feline-Free Tomorrow has been slamming him for his use of catnip and lack of military service, which might be why he's not showing up highly in any of the polls right now.

Source

Molly

Talk about big dreams, Molly, a dachshund, ran for president in the 2008 presidential race on the BYOB ticket. If the problem was a lack of publicity, well, she's running again this year, so let's help get her name out there people. She's certainly much more adorable than either Obama or Romney, but I don't think she can legally qualify for president being as how she's only six and the president must be at least 35 –that is, unless dog years count.

Source

Boston Curtis

There are some roles that animals are actually better qualified for though. After all, precinct committeemen are basically just there to help recruit new voters and gain support for their party. That's why Boston Curtis, a mule, could have been such a great precinct committeeman. Unfortunately, he was elected in 1938 as the Republican committeeman while looking just like the main symbol of the Democrats. Even so, he won 51 to zero –although that was really because he was the only candidate running. No word on how well he did in the position, but he certainly entertained the nation.

Soetoro’s (aka BHO) Eligibility Case Going to Kennedy of the U.S. Supreme Court

By Plaintiff: Edward C. Noonan
National Chairman – American Resistance Party

The California Supreme Court last week refused to hear the case brought before it concerning the repeated accusation that Mr. Barry Soetoro (aka BHO) was not a U.S. Citizen. The lawsuit that was filed by Attorney Orly Taitz accused Mr. Soetoro of failing to provide documentation that he was born in the United States. Instead, in the past, Mr. Soetoro has provided bogus and forged birth certificates and placed those felonious frauds on the White House website. Since Mr. Soetoro has failed to provide valid citizenship documents, he is to be considered an illegal alien and not a valid U.S. Citizen.

The next step will be to appeal to the U.S. Supreme-Court-Cesspool. Our case will be submitted to pro-Sodomite Anthony Kennedy. The ungodly Justice Kennedy sided with the court's liberal wing on the two major sodomite-rights cases to date, Lawrence v. Texas and Romer v. Evans.

It is totally insane to believe that there can be any righteous and fair hearing to be received under the guardianship of the brain-dead sinner that Kennedy has proved himself to be.

(Above) pResident Soetoro with Supreme Court Justices Anthony Kennedy, Samuel Alito, and John Roberts before addressing a joint session of Congress, Washington, D.C., February 2009

And the photo above shows the Supreme Court Justices clapping for the Alien-in-Chief!

This is one of the SOBs that will refuse to judge our case? As far as I am concerned they all are ungodly collaborators of the evil one and all are spawns of the Soetoro-Serpent-Seed-goon-squad.

These are the same jackasses that refused to hear the eligibility matter in 2009 when it was brought before them. They deferred to the lower court’s ruling that the “Secretary of State” Debra Bowen had no duty to insure that elections were honest and fair and that qualified/eligible candidates were placed on the ballot.

And now, four years later, election fraud abounds! Not a single state can boast of fair and honest elections. Instead, the election process has become another cesspool for the DC slime-creatures to wallow in. And so the question remains on many Amerikan’s minds…”was the election stolen?”

There is no question in my mind that Supreme Cesspool Justice Kennedy will dismiss our lawsuit without a hearing, and disregarding our right to be heard as claimed by our DEAD U.S. Constitution. When the Bill of Rights declares that all people have a God-given (inalienable) right to “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances then the Supremes fail to fulfill their Constitutional duties.”

(Above) Here is Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice of the United States, sleeping through Barack Obama's 2009 inaugural address. Even his pal Antonin Scalia had the decency to frown through the speech with his eyes open. Kennedy just looks brain-dead.

And for the next four years, the sleeping Supreme Cesspool has been unwake-able. The voices of millions of Amerikans have been unheard by the Supremes.

It is my opinion that these jackals will be asleep next month as well. Perhaps they all will be semi-awake at the private (press denied access) swearing in of Mr. Soetoro on January 20th, but I can assure you that they will all be asleep again during the January 21st illegal swearing in of the DE FACTO alien-in-chief Soetoro.

Of course, the American public will be asleep on January 21st as well. A “Peaceful” Civil Disobedience protest event is supposed to be slated during the illegal inauguration of the “Alien.” But I doubt that more than a hundred or so will turn out. There is very little chatter anywhere in Amerika about this event. I guess the morons of Amerika will be home cashing their welfare/social security checks! They just don’t give a rat’s patoot.

Since I cannot cough up the big bucks to head across the United States to be at the National event, I will organize a local event at the California State Capitol in Sacramento. So far, I have me and my wiener dog, Roxie. No one else cares to get involved. But I guess there is always hope. I have hopes that we can resurrect our dead Constitution by draining the D.C. cesspool, and then next we need to flush our California Capitol City toilet. Call me if you can break away from the porn on your computer.

In his Service,
Plaintiff: Edward C. Noonan
National Chairman – American Resistance Party

Supreme Court denies Noonan v. Bowen/Soetoro Petition

From the Desk of Edward C. Noonan – National Committee Chairman
American Resistance Party

Tony Dolz
to: "Edward C. Noonan"
date: Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:50 PM
subject: Ed, how confident do you feel? . . . Supreme Court of CA is set to rule any day

Hello Ed,

My thoughts are with you and the other plaintiffs. Will the case be heard on the merits this time, do you think? Is there still a possibility that the court will try to throw you off on standing?
What are the chances the Supreme Court will rule before the electoral college vote and inauguration?

Best wishes,

Tony

MY REPLY:

Supreme Court denies Noonan v. Bowen/Soetoro Petition for Writ of Mandate/Prohibition

Sacramento, CA – The corrupt California Supreme Court has proved once more that they care little for the rule of law and the Supremacy of the Constitution, and instead, make up “opinions” as they go along. The Supreme “bozos” denied a fair hearing on the Writ of Mandate of Petitioners Noonan, MacLeran, Judd and Orly Taitz regarding the illegal alien who had usurped the White House and seized the reins of the office of Commander-in-Chief.

See: http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=2031802&doc_no=S207078

This is the same court that violated their Constitutional oaths of office by ruling in a 2008 Pro-Sodomite case. In this other opinion, written by former Chief Justice Ronald George, they cited the court's 1948 decision in Perez v. Sharp that reversed the state's interracial marriages ban. The court found that "equal respect and dignity" of marriage is a "basic civil right" that cannot be withheld from sodomite couples, that sodomite sexual orientation is a protected class like race and gender, and that any classification or discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is subject to strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause of the California State Constitution.

It is also the same court that has a close association to Mr. Soetoro (aka BHO). One of the Associate Justices, Goodwin Hon Liu (Chinese: 劉弘威; pinyin: Liú Hóngwēi) recently served on the education policy and agency review teams of the pResidential transition of Mr. Soetoro.

Liu had a former relationship with Mr. Soetoro. Wikipedia states of Mr. Liu, “On February 24, 2010, pResident Barack Obama nominated Liu to fill a vacancy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.[2] For more than a year, Liu's nomination languished, amid significant opposition from Republicans in the U.S. Senate. On May 19, 2011, the Senate rejected cloture on Liu's nomination in a 52-43 vote,[3] and on May 25, 2011, Liu informed President Obama that he was withdrawing his name from consideration to the seat on the Ninth Circuit, telling the president that "With no possibility of an up-or-down vote on the horizon, my family and I have decided that it is time for us to regain the ability to make plans for the future."[4] On July 29, 2011, President Obama formally notified the Senate that he was withdrawing Liu's nomination for the 9th Circuit.”

“On July 26, 2011, Governor Jerry Brown nominated Liu to a seat on the Supreme Court of California, succeeding Associate Justice Carlos R. Moreno.[6] He was sworn in on September 1, 2011.[7]”

With the above in mind, one can see that our Court system is completely corrupt. I have had a long run-in with the corrupt judicial system.

I was a litigant in a 2003 CA Court of Appeal - Third Appellate District case, and have for a long time understood the corrupt nature of the California court system. In the California Elections code it stated that a “deputy voter registrar” could go anywhere in any county, to register people to vote. I was arrested at Albertson’s in Nevada City, CA registering people to vote. You can read about the case here: http://www.law.com/jsp/ca/PubArticleCA.jsp?id=900005580375&

The California Elections Code states: 2103 (b) “It is also the intent of the Legislature that county elections officials, in order to promote and encourage voter registrations, shall enlist the support and cooperation of interested citizens and organizations, and shall deputize as registrars qualified citizens in such a way as to reach most effectively every resident of the county. The persons so deputized shall be permitted to register voters anywhere within the county, including at the places of residence of the persons to be registered, and the county elections official shall not deny deputy registrars the right to register voters anywhere in the county.”

So the courts have a long history of not obeying the law, and not obeying the Constitution. Most Judges are thugs and opportunists. The denial of a fair hearing at the Supreme Court level is par for the course. The paperwork for this case was filed on December 4th and it was rejected two days later on December 6th. It does not sound like there is much honor nor integrity in this “Supreme Cesspool.” (These are just my personal opinions and my personal comments.)

Edward C. Noonan
Founder
American Resistance Party